HEARD IN HAMBURG AND BANNED IN BLASDELL

By Kevin Gaughan

Monday night in the Village of Hamburg, as often happens on this tour, the most interesting part of the evening was the citizen discussion that followed my presentation.

Village chambers were filled with folks eager to assess the idea of smaller government. And with insight and knowledge, they did for almost an hour. A majority spoke in favor of my proposal to either downsize the board or hold a referendum on consolidating village government.

And Hamburg residents already understood something that I’ve learned during this effort: that consolidating government doesn’t mean diluting or eliminating services. Indeed, it means delivering those services at less cost.

Here’s a brief video clip from our Village of Hamburg presentation:

Lifted by the energy of the Hamburg discussion, we arrived in Blasdell last night with heads high and spirits even higher. As we entered village hall, though, Mayor Ernie Jewett summoned me to his office and changed everything. He said that I could not use the word “consolidation” or “dissolution” in my presentation. If I did, he would end the meeting and have me removed from the hall.

Two of my students from UB Law School, Lindsay Heckler and Dan Lesniewski, were along last night. Dan was outraged by Jewett’s stricture. Lindsay seemed almost saddened at the notion that anyone, let alone a public official, would attempt to curtail another’s right to free speech.

But to cast Mayor Jewett’s order in a constitutional context elevates his small gesture beyond its worth. Jewett acted out of fear. Fear of having residents learn that perhaps there’s a better way to govern than his; fear that citizens would connect the dots between too much government and too little growth; and fear that a system that’s served him better than it has served residents might be forced to change.

The once proud Village of Blasdell today bears more resemblance to an abandoned community. In the over 30 years since the steel industry that sustained it collapsed, no government and no politician has reversed its painful decline. If you are under 18 or over 65 and live in Blasdell, according to the most recent U.S. Census, you likely live near or under the poverty line. And no matter what your age, the value your home, the number of your neighbors, and the quality of your life have all declined.

Against that painful backdrop, last night Ernie Jewett refused to discuss the need for reform. As far more powerful politicians throughout history have learned, though, while he can ban the idea of change in his chambers, he cannot banish it from the minds of citizens.

12 Responses to “HEARD IN HAMBURG AND BANNED IN BLASDELL”

  1. Rob Little Says:

    Keep Up The Good Work! More and more people are behind you.You give Us hope.

  2. Mike Lowe Says:

    Mr. Jewitt’s actions are an example of what is wrong with our governmental structure. I would encourage anyone who lives in Blasdell to attend one of Kevin’s presentations somewhere else, and substitute Blasdell for the other community name.
    Perhaps, if someone in Blasdell has a facility large enough to hold a group of people, Kevin can give his presentation free from Mr. Jewett and his fear of reality.
    Thank you Kevin, and staff, for your insightful, and informational. program. Keep up the good work.

  3. d g keller Says:

    Kevin will someday be remembered as the wise one among us, who had the courage to try and fix what is so terribly wrong with NY. As a transplant for half my life, I see that the overlapping services, the top heavy government here is sucking the life out of NYers. We have an uncut jewel, clean air and water, green countrysides, and a topography unmatched. Yet instead of making it work for us, we drive out our young and old because of the exponential tax burden here. “less is more” is really true, and now is the time to DO IT!!!

  4. BuffaloSoldier Says:

    How unfortunate it is for a public servant to deny the right to free speech, either by its residents or others. Although the degree to which change should occur can by intelligently debated, the fact that bottom line change is needed cannot.

    The least our politicians can do, in exchange for their failed leadership, is to listen to their citizens. However, the better alternative would be for their citizens to vote them out of office, thereby changing the old guard anew.

    Good job Kevin, keep up the good work. We know you don’t do this for gains in power and/or money.. and that is duly noted.

  5. Buffalo Booster Says:

    Mr. Jewitt’s actions ring of small mindedness & protection of one’s shrinking turf.
    Perhaps he’s afraid of being in the public work force. Blasdell’s Lake Ave. looks like a deserted landscape. Carlin’s grocery store has been vacant for years & is now an eyesore.
    Blasdell does not have an economic plan. If it does, it’s a well kept secret.

  6. Buffalo Pundit » Blog Archive » Small Mindedness in Small Doses can have Huge Consequences Says:

    [...] Bruce Andriatch’s column today, I find this recount of Kevin Gaughan’s “The Cost” tour’s stop in the Village of Blasdell: we arrived in Blasdell last night with heads high and spirits even higher. As we entered village [...]

  7. When Will The Cost Be Too Much To Bear? « First Time Caller, Long Time Listener Says:

    [...]   There’s more and better thought out reactions to this story at the following links:   Kevin’s Blog at TheCost.org - “HEARD IN HAMBURG AND BANNED IN BLASDELL” Buffalo Pundit – “Small Mindedness [...]

  8. RaChaCha Says:

    I agree with D G Keller about Kevin’s wisdom and courage, which is never so much on display than when he has to maintain his equanimity and civility when dealing with throwbacks like Mayor Jewett.

    Some on a crusade take the tack of trying to overpower the small-minded, but Kevin bears with the nonsense – keeping his eyes on the prize – letting the Mayor Jewetts of western New York (and there are plenty) show themselves for who they are.

    Normally, I wouldn’t dream of speaking of Mayor Jewett this way – someone I’ve never met, and in whose shoes I haven’t tried to mentally place myself – but his threat to end the meeting and have Kevin removed is just outrageously beyond the pale. We’re very fortunate to have had Bruce Andriatch tell all of us about it.

  9. Scott Marcin Says:

    The reaction of the Mayor Jewett is nothing but business as usual. The reaction of the local governments has been truly disappointing, but hardly surprising. Each local government, viewing itself as its own fiefdom, is now in pure preservation mode. And I do not mean preservation, as in each areas unique qualities and history, but the the preservation of the public gravy train for those employed by such. The supporters of the cause for consolidation of services and government in general now need to push the next step. Either the matter needs to be put up to referendum among the voters of each community, or we need to organize our own party to put people in place in each community to establish the ultimate solutions. It is patently obvious that the politicians will not listen to reasoned discourse, factual evidence, or to a disheartened public. They will not, nor have they ever, act in the best interest of the people they serve. Consequently, we must cull from the ranks, those people who in each town or village, are able to carry the mantle of regionalism, and begin to return our cherished Western New York to its past glories.

  10. Mark Bernas Says:

    I was offended, though not entirely surprised, to learn of Mr. Jewitt’s interference with your planned presentation in the Village of Blasdell. I’m keeping some of my private thoughts regarding his character and leadership to myself here (as a former Blasdell resident and local volunteer firefighter, I don’t have a great deal of respect for him) but let me say that I agree with your assessment of his motivation: fear. Fear of his constituency realizing how unnecessary he, as the representative of their government, is.

    Blasdell, a community that grew up around a stop on the local railway to Buffalo, screams “abandoned” on every corner. I don’t believe that any substantial reason exists for it to maintain its own government, and that all services it provides: DPW, police, fire protection… are very nearly (if not completely) irrelevant given its small size and location within the Town of Hamburg. If the cost:benefit reality ever sinks in with enough people in the village, things will change.

  11. Hank Says:

    Donn Esmonde praises progress in North Collins:

    http://www.buffalonews.com/donnesmonde/story/358512.html

  12. Philip J. Markert Says:

    Mr. G:
    I read your study and quickly noticed that you included a ratio of citizens per legislator, which after some analysis proved very misleading, if you do the math, it works out to $19 per citizen in Buffalo, but in the town of Hamburg, it is $14 per citizen. Explain why you don’t include this important figure in your study? You say that the suburbs are overspending for government. I have lived in Hamburg for 47 years and I have been happy with the current level of representation and services in this town. If you succeed in eliminating one town councilman you will save 36 cents per citizen per year, I think that is money well spent for the representation and services I receive. The low pay and time these councilmen spend is a bargain for what we get. The problem is with the state gov and all they waste.

Leave a Reply